Research Safety Continuity Plan Overview and FAQs

​Research Safety Continuity Plan During Sabbatical Leave and Other Scheduled Leaves of Absence

Preamble and Intent

Conducting research and academic activities with safety as a priority is a core institutional value of the University of Michigan. Central to maintaining a safety-first culture is the active involvement and physical presence of faculty to ensure all day-to-day research and academic activities are conducted to the highest safety standards. Faculty are ultimately responsible for ensuring all members of their team conduct research and academic activities safely and a faculty member’s physical presence on campus is critical for maintaining a proactive and resilient safety-first culture. The physical presence of faculty is central to many of the day-to-day elements of a safety-first culture, including, but not limited to, the following:

  • correcting deficiencies in a timely and sustainable manner;
  • immediately correcting unsafe and unhealthful workplace conditions;
  • being available to immediately respond to identified hazards or incidents;
  • continually ensuring all team members abide by a safety-first culture and U-M research safety guidelines;
    serving as a role model;
  • ensuring students and staff are trained to conduct research and creative practice activities safely and understand the risks involved in the research;
  • listening to and acting on safety concerns;
  • reporting near misses and incidents; and
  • establishing a learning culture wherein the faculty sets expectations for team members to make themselves aware of safety updates, learn from incidents and near misses, and openly discuss safety-related concerns and best practices.

To effectively perform these safety oversight responsibilities, faculty members whose research and creative practice programs involve activities having potential hazards to personnel and/or the environment that are inspected by EHS (e.g., research laboratories, shops, studios) are expected to be physically present on campus at least 2-3 days/week each week. Faculty who are planning a sabbatical or a scheduled leave of absence where they cannot meet this standard must identify a proxy and establish an approved safety oversight plan to ensure continuity of oversight while they are not physically on campus. This policy establishes a proxy-based system to ensure effective safety oversight remains ongoing while faculty who oversee research and creative practice activities involving hazards are not physically present in their assigned spaces (e.g., research laboratories, shops, studios) for extended periods of time, specifically for faculty sabbaticals and other scheduled leaves of absence.

The intent of this appendix is to outline the process by which a proxy will be identified and act on behalf of a faculty member who is not physically present in their assigned spaces due to sabbaticals or other scheduled leaves of absence. The amount of safety oversight may vary among the units and may depend on the faculty’s safety-compliance history, the nature and severity of hazards involved, and the size and composition of their research team.

Proxy-based Safety Oversight Plan

Faculty Responsibilities: In advance of a timeframe when a faculty member expects to be on sabbatical or other scheduled leave of absence, the faculty member must develop an effective safety-oversight plan to manage their research and creative practice activities during such timeframe while not physically present. This must include (i) the naming of a faculty or a full-time/permanent staff member to serve as a proxy and (ii) proposing and documenting that discussions took place to describe how the proxy will provide effective, ongoing oversight of research activities and the supervision of members of the research team. Students cannot serve as a proxy.

The discussion must include a description of research and creative practice activities and the major hazards and risks involved. The discussion should also include the Chemical Hygiene Plan, SOPs, Training Plan and other important elements that the proxy needs to understand to provide effective oversight of the space. The proxy should also be added to the MI safety portal for the spaces they are overseeing. For research and creative practice activities with more severe potential hazards, the faculty member and proxy must work with their EHS inspector to ensure the safety oversight plan is effective.

The naming of a proxy does not abdicate the faculty member from their research and creative practice safety responsibilities. The faculty member is also responsible for ensuring the proxy is willing, available, knowledgeable, and empowered to effectively oversee safety to the highest standards. Further, the faculty member must ensure all members of their team are aware of the proxy’s identity and their oversight responsibilities, and modify the emergency response information to reflect the change in oversight. The faculty member must replace the proxy or return onsite if the proxy is unwilling or otherwise unable to effectively implement the safety oversight plan. The form will require a signature from both the faculty member, the proxy and the chair/division chief to whom they report, and the proxy and the chair/division chief to whom the proxy reports.

Proxy Responsibilities: The proxy must be willing, available, knowledgeable, and empowered to perform safety oversight effectively while the faculty member is not physically present in their assigned space due to a sabbatical or other scheduled leave of absence. The proxy must be broadly knowledgeable of safety and have an awareness and knowledge of the hazards specific to the faculty member’s research and creative practice activities. The proxy must take additional training through EHS in the event they are not knowledgeable of the hazards specific to the faculty member’s research and creative practice activities. The proxy must be available to the faculty, staff, and students comprising the faculty member’s research team and able to correct deficiencies in a timely manner, ensure staff and students are trained, respond to safety inquiries, and maintain overall compliance with UM guidelines. The proxy must notify the faculty member in the event they are unavailable and/or no longer willing, able, or available to oversee safety.

Plan Oversight and Compliance: Plans and accompanying attestations must be signed by the faculty members, proxy, and (filed with their) department chair(s). These plans and attestations must be renewed annually if the duration of the sabbatical or scheduled leave of absence extends beyond 1 year. Approved plan submissions and attestations will be included in the sabbatical or leave of absence application and filed jointly with the department chair(s) and EHS. The existing resolution process for safety oversight will be used to ensure unit- and campus-wide compliance with establishing a proxy-based system when needed.

Coordination with Other Compliance Oversight Programs/Committees: In the safety-oversight template, the faculty member will include the types of research involved and the compliance oversight committees (e.g., research safety, human subjects, IBC, controlled substances, animal welfare). There is also a section for sponsored research. The faculty member must check the box for each compliance entity for which they have a protocol in place, and the final approval will automatically be sent to the respective committee once all approvals are in place.

Each compliance oversight committee has the responsibility to review and request revisions of the compliance protocols to ensure the research is conducted according to UM guidelines. Faculty members must initiate a plan well in advance to ensure the research is conducted according to U-M guidelines. Faculty members must initiate a plan well in advance of an expected absence to ensure all stakeholders have had time to review and respond to the proposed safety-oversight plan. Faculty must make themselves aware of funding sponsor requirements regarding the physical presence of faculty for overseeing research on campus.

General Questions

Who has to submit a Research Safety Continuity Plan?

All faculty researchers who work in research and creative practice spaces overseen by EHS and who will be absent 2-3 days/week for an extended period due to a sabbatical or leave of absence. 

A plan is recommended for all other situations where a faculty member is absent 2-3 days/week. Short- term absences due to vacations or conferences do not need a plan to be in place.

I conduct clinical research in the hospital; do I need to submit a Research Safety Continuity Plan?

No, a Research Safety Continuity Plan is needed for faculty having programs in research and creative spaces that EHS inspects (e.g., research laboratories, shops, studios). However, we would recommend that you notify the IRB and/or IACUC in advance of a sabbatical or leave of absence for their awareness.

I have a planned extended leave, when should I submit a Research Safety Continuity Plan?

To the extent possible, a plan should be initiated when the need for an extended leave is known. This will provide time to establish a proxy, ensure they are knowledgeable of the hazards involved in your research or creative practice, and all relevant compliance committees have had time to review your plan and ask for additional information, should that be necessary.

I plan to take my sabbatical on campus; do I need to submit a Research Safety Oversight Plan?

No, if you are on campus and plan to oversee safety in your research or creative space, then a plan is not necessary.

A family emergency suddenly arose, and I must be out of state/country for many weeks. Can I submit a Research Safety Continuity Plan after leaving?

Yes, please submit a plan as soon as your situation allows.

I plan to work remotely and to be physically present in my assigned space a few days per month while on sabbatical. Do I still need to establish a Research Safety Continuity Plan?

A plan is recommended. Faculty are expected to be physically in their assigned spaces 2-3 days/week each week consistently to oversee research and creative practice safety.  Consistent oversight is important for a strong safety culture and even though the faculty may be present for a few days, it is expected that this oversight will be ongoing.

My proxy will take a paid 2-week vacation during the planned oversight period. What do I do?

Safety oversight is expected to be continuous to the extent possible. For a 2-week vacation, the faculty member may want to consider designating an alternative proxy or plan to come back on site to ensure effective safety oversight.

The person most knowledgeable about the hazards in my research area works remotely (or another part of campus). Can I use them as my proxy?

No, a key provision of the proxy is that they are physically present in or near your assigned space and that they are available to oversee safety.

My work is also overseen by other regulatory units. Should I also notify them if I am going to be on sabbatical or extended leave?

Yes. When you fill out the Research Safety Continuity plan, it will prompt you to answer if you have protocols with a compliance oversight group. When those are checked, the final approved plan will automatically get routed to the respective group.

Who should I submit my Safety Continuity Plan to?

Completion of the Research Safety Continuity plan by the faculty member will then be routed to the proxy and the chair for their approval. Once finalized, EHS, RASC and any compliance oversight groups checked during the process will be notified automatically.

Proxy Guidelines

My lab is run and managed by senior PhD students. Can one of them serve as a proxy while I am out on sabbatical?

No, trainees or postdocs cannot serve as safety-oversight proxies.

Who should serve as a proxy?

A faculty or staff member who is available 2-3 days per week, each week you are out and who is knowledgeable and empowered to oversee safety.

What is required of a proxy?

Proxies must take the required training necessary for leading the space they are proxying for.

Can my proxy be from a different department or unit?

Yes, your proxy can be from a different department or unit. The key factor is that the proxy should have an understanding of the safety requirements in your research or creative space and be empowered to take necessary steps to ensure safety.

Process Guidelines

How do I move forward with complying with this policy?

For faculty whose research or creative spaces are overseen by EHS and who are submitting leave requests for sabbaticals that will begin in Fall 2026 or later, the online version of form HR36620 Sabbatical Leave Request should be utilized. Human Resources is in the process of updating all its forms, moving away from the downloadable PDF versions to online formats. Currently, the downloadable version of HR36620 remains available on the forms website, but this version does not include the question about the research safety continuity plan and should therefore not be used. If the downloadable version of HR36620 is used, this does not eliminate the need for a research safety continuity plan if warranted.

As of October 1, form HR36609 Faculty Leave of Absence Request has not yet been updated to include the question about the research safety continuity plan. Nevertheless, faculty whose research or creative spaces are overseen by EHS and who are submitting a leave of absence request beginning in Fall 2026 or later will be required to have a research safety continuity plan in place.

Why is this important?

The Research Safety Continuity plan provides a simple proxy-based solution for researchers pursuing leaves of absence and establishes a clear line of delegated authority and responsibility to ensure effective safety oversight. 

 

The policy is one part of an overarching effort to strengthen the culture of safety at U-M and ensure continuous safety oversight and accountability